There’s a very simple business reason why Google cares if they have your real name. It means it’s possible to cross-relate your account with your buying behavior with their partners, who might be banks, retailers, supermarkets, hospitals, airlines. To connect with your use of cell phones that might be running their mobile operating system. To provide identity in a commerce-ready way. And to give them information about what you do on the Internet, without obfuscation of pseudonyms.
Simply put, a real name is worth more than a fake one.
The entire post is worth a read, and Dave is pretty spot on. The Google reps I've spoken to deny this, but it's obvious to anyone who understands how Google works. Just about everything they do and service they provide is about search and advertising even if they don't seem related to search and advertising directly.
I'm sure that the real name/common name policy is also rooted in other beliefs held by the heads of the Google+ project. However, given all the pushback on this both externally and internally, it seems like a policy they should have given up if it was just about a misunderstanding of how people operate on the Internets. Throw in the fact that it's about money, better data mining, and the ability to tie what you do online to what you buy, and things crystallize a bit.
This post was syndicated from my Tumblr. Comment below or Reblog @ Tumblr.
To see all of my Tumblr posts, please follow me there.
A user of Google+ was logged into Google with both individual and his company’s Google Apps login, and discovered that Google+ can be used — at least partially — with Google Apps:
As reported by Google Operating System, Google’s John Costigan confirmed this: “We’re actively working on making Profiles (and Google+) available for Google Apps - it should be available in the coming months.”
Personally, I feel that this is where the tools that Google+ offers may be of greatest utility, as a stream-based business collaboration tool, an example of what I call work media. As I recently wondered, the effort involved in defining circles might not be worth the effort. However, if you are working in a company of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people, creating circles for projects, departments, or topically-oriented collections of people makes a lot of sense.
Note also that Google Apps already has an app store architecture, so the rollout of apps like Huddle and Hangouts would be simple.
And there is the opportunity to convert the over 25M Google Apps users to something worth paying for.
This is an excellent idea. I do think workflow could be improved by Google+ for Apps accounts. Especially for long email conversation chains. Too bad my magazine is no longer using Google Apps.
This post was syndicated from my Tumblr. Comment below or Reblog @ Tumblr.
To see all of my Tumblr posts, please follow me there.
"As I'm browsing around Google-powered sites there’s occasionally a red notification alert that pops up and immediately grabs my attention. Soon enough I'm clicking through the various notifications and seeing what my friends have shared and who has recently begun sharing with me."
-- The One Google Plus Feature Facebook Should Fear (via digiture)
This post was syndicated from my Tumblr. Comment below or Reblog @ Tumblr.
To see all of my Tumblr posts, please follow me there.
“By limiting the number of people who can join Google+, Google is hugely limiting what kind of experience those people will have. Early adopters have plenty of influence on mainstream opinion and love to boast, so if they log into a barren wasteland then you can bet they’ll be telling their friends that ‘yeah, I’m on Google+, but it’s not that great’.”
-- Duncan Geere writing at Wired’s Epicenter blog on why you don’t need to find yourself a Google+ invite (via cnnmoneytech)
This sounds really familiar….
Oh right, it’s what everyone was saying when Google Wave came out.
This post was syndicated from my Tumblr. Comment below or Reblog @ Tumblr.
To see all of my Tumblr posts, please follow me there.
-
Jason Calacanis, February 10th, 2010 on Google Buzz.
I occasionally reread this article to feel better about myself.
(via nerdcast)
I have no words for this. Really, Google? Really?
This post was syndicated from my Tumblr. Comment below or Reblog @ Tumblr.
To see all of my Tumblr posts, please follow me there.
I appeared on TechVi’s Bottom Line today talking about Google Chrome OS with Molly Wood of c|net. Click here to see the show (it’s short — just under 6 minutes). We’re playing around with Chrome OS in the office now and I’m vaguely impressed but hesitant to get excited about it. What will be most cool is that features from the OS will end up in the browser, so everyone will have a chance to experience a bit of Chrome no matter what kind of computer you have.
I was reading this piece at the Financial Times (registration might be required) about the Microsoft/Yahoo alliance. Toward the bottom the Yahoo folks explained how turning their search technology over to Microsoft would yield benefits for both companies:
For example, a search for Yankees slugger Alex Rodriguez might return the standard Microsoft results but also up-to-date batting statistics from Yahoo’s leading sports site and tabloid stories from Yahoo News partners.
Personally, I would find this annoying. But then I think I do less random searching and far more targeted searching than the people this kind of thing is aimed for. I’m less likely to search for a celebrity because I want to see what’s up with them lately, I usually hunt for specific information. So if my search for George Clooney turns up a whole bunch of random stuff — the latest tabloid headline about him, reviews of his newest movie, and stats for how many women he’s slept with — I’m going to be annoyed at that search page.
This is why I think Google dominates more than anything else. Yes, the adwords ads and paid search results can be annoying (and also hilarious), but otherwise the search pages are just results, which is what I want. I don’t want a web of inter-related information.
I wonder if I’m alone?
Comparing the Google approach to the one Yahoo will offer, which do you prefer? Is one more helpful in your everyday searching than the other?
K. T. Bradford
If code is poetry, then CSS is The Iliad. In the original Greek.
I write about and review mobile technology, which means I get to spend the day steeped in laptops, smartphones, tablets, eReaders, and other things that go beep. Lest you question my status as a ChicGeek, I'll proudly claim an unabashed love for netbooks, Linux, science fiction, and curly hair products. Currently I'm a reviewer for Tecca and Black Enterprise‘s Tech section.
New Tech
- The Long Path To Market For Lenovo’s Yoga Gives Me Hope I’ll See Other Devices I Want Someday
- Why Google+ Wants Your Real Name
- Sharing Contact Information Digitally: Why Isn’t This Easy For Android Phones?
- Liz Henry: The Best Apps for BlogHer ’11
- “You announce what kind of phone you have and you’ll spend the next hour enduring an obnoxious holy war”
Tagged Tech
accessories Acer Android Apple Apple Tablet apps ASUS ASUS UL30 ASUS UL30A being geeky clips code is poetry CULV processor Cute Tech facebook Fedora Firefox Google iPhone Journalism LAPTOP Magazine laptops linkedin Linux Linux Mint Mandriva Linux my reviews netbook netbooks notebook operating systems PCLinuxOS Samsung Samsung N110 Samsung NC10 Samsung NC10 Special Edition smartphones tablets tech Ubuntu ultraportable ULV processor USB Drives USB Hub web designOld Tech










